Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is just a little bit thicker and notably heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition, the same resolution back camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has higher video frame rates. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.