Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 82.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4 XL. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and Google Pixel 4 XL have extremely similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same resolution camera in the back and the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with higher video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.