Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, but it's extremely heavier. HTC One M9 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit processing unit.
HTC One M9 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a camera with a way lower resolution and a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.