Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2018-11-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 83.8 against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 body is newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a more MP camera.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.