Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting an 85.3 score against 83.8. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, it's incredibly thinner and way newer. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, they have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display, a brighter screen and a much higher resolution of 1892 x 2688px. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a slightly better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a back camera with a higher 12.2 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 39% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.