Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older and a little heavier phone than the Motorola One Hyper, but Xiaomi made it just a little thinner anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Hyper captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Hyper features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.