Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 83.8 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older and a little heavier cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Xiaomi could make it thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, both of them have equal internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a way better video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.