Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and the nubia Red Magic 5S count with similar processing units, they have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and the same screen brightness, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better 64 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs and a way better video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.