Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a general score of 83.8 against 83.1. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older and a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a bit larger display, a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a brighter screen and a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much more MP camera, a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.