Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a just a bit heavier device than the Galaxy A25 5G, but both are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with way more brightness and a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.