Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy A30's score of 79.6. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a much heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Galaxy A30. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30. Both have a display of the same size, the same pixels density and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations and a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.