Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's general score of 83.8. The Galaxy A50 is a a bit thinner and way lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, even though both were released with only 4 months difference. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50. Both of them have a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a same size display. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.