Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, with an 86.6 score against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is newer, a bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have a display of the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution and the same screen pixels density. The Galaxy A50s captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy A50s has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.