Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 general score. The Galaxy A52 is a lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but both of them are equally thin. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.