Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having a score of 91.3 against 83.8. Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but both are equally thin. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.