Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A70. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with faster video frame rate and a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Galaxy A70 features a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.