Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a thicker phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but both of them weight 7.69oz. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density and more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.