Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 score. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, it's thinner and newer. The Galaxy Fold has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and a same size back camera sensor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 37% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.