Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's global score of 83.8. The Galaxy S10e is a lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, although they were only released 4 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10e's processor is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality, a 0.39 inches sensor and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a camera in the back with more MP.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.