Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a score of 95.4 against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is extremely newer, but just a little heavier and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a just a little greater screen density and a lot brighter display. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better resolution camera, a much higher video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.