Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-01 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Green | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a quite better display density and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much better processing power than Galaxy S25. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way larger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a much more MP back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S25 counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.