Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-01 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Green | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a 90.7 score against 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and much thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a little bit larger display, a little higher pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and much more screen brightness. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra feature very similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos, a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a way better video definition and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.