Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-11-01 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Green | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a global score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. The Galaxy S6 Active has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy S6 Active features a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a greater camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lot less MP camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and a larger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 9 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.