Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a general score of 83.8 against 75.8. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and a lot newer. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has less brightness and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S7 Active has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with a higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.