Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-11-01 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's overall score of 83.3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S9, but it is extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same sensor size, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.