Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released about 17 months before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.