Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 83.8 score against 81. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.