Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having a score of 88.5 against 83.8. Galaxy Z Flip's body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Galaxy Z Flip features a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip both have quite similar memory for games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.