Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having a 94.6 score against 83.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 one, both of them have equal internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 41 percent larger battery size. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.