Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| 2018-11-01 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than Xperia XZ Premium, with a score of 83.8 against 79.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's design is newer than the Xperia XZ Premium's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ Premium features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display density, a bit brighter screen and a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xperia XZ Premium and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 count with extremely similar batteries duration, although the Xperia XZ Premium also has a 1% more battery capacity. The Xperia XZ Premium and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 both have similar cameras, because although the Xperia XZ Premium has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.