Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| 2018-11-01 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is just a bit better than Xperia XZs, having a score of 83.8 against 77.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is newer than Xperia XZs's, but it is incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little sharper screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZs features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and faster video frame rate.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.