Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with an 83.8 score against 76.6. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older and a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's design is still just a little bit thinner. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way more megapixels back camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.