Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 score. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a bit thinner anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 57% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.