Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's global score of 82.5. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 2 XL, but it is noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera with a much better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 and Google Pixel 2 XL have extremely similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have equal internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.