Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is incredibly older and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is still a bit thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4. Both have the same number of pixels per screen inch, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display of the same size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a battery lifetime that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's battery duration. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.