Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a score of 89, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F62's global score of 88.1. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 body is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Galaxy F62, and both were released only a couple of months apart.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4. They have a same size display, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a better pixel number per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a much better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy F62 features much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.