Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's overall score of 89. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released just a bit over a year before. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has Android 11 version, providing some additional features.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit bigger display and a greater pixel number in each display inch.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Mi Mix 4.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same back camera sensor size, the same 24 fps video frame rates, a same resolution camera and the same video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.