Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, with a score of 95.4 against 89. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, we must note that it is also just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a camera that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 one, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a larger aperture, they both have a same resolution back camera, a same size sensor, the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rate. Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.