Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-10 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 89 score against 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 body is newer, lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Xiaomi Mi Mix 4.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.