Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's global score of 89. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, but it's notably heavier and was released only 11 months before. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you identical operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a quite larger display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery duration is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.