Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Titanium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a little bit better than Apple iPhone X, having a overall score of 88.9 against 88.1. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is newer than Apple iPhone X, it is a lot heavier and extremely thicker. Apple iPhone X features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a really smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 49 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.