Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Titanium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a score of 88.9, which is slightly better than iPhone XS's 84.2 score. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's construction is newer than the iPhone XS's, but it is notably heavier and noticeably thicker. The iPhone XS has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lot lower 1125 x 2436px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha captures a bit better videos and photos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.