Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a score of 88.9, which is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is notably heavier and thicker. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2880, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a little better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.