Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | -- |
| 8.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Titanium | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 389 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a score of 88.9, which is much better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s overall score of 79.2. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has 10 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a really superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.