Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.56 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is much better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a score of 88.9 against 79.9. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's body is much older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A25 5G.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per inch of screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 6 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels, a much smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors and a tinier diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.