Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Titanium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has an overall score of 88.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 general score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha construction is way heavier and noticeably thicker than the Galaxy A50. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher 2088 x 2250 resolution and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a lot larger back camera sensor, a camera with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.