Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, with a general score of 88.9 against 86.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a better 2088 x 2250 resolution.
Galaxy A50s has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, a way smaller sensor taking much worse quality videos and photos, a worse (4K) video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.