Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Titanium | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a 90.7 score against 88.9. The Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a better resolution of 2088 x 2250px. Galaxy A52 captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a way tinier camera sensor, a back facing camera with a way lower 64 mega pixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in low light environments.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.