Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 389 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A71, getting a general score of 88.9 against 87.5. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A71 has Android 11. Even being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha construction is notably heavier and a lot thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A71.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2088 x 2250 pixels and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a tinier aperture, a much lower 64 MP resolution camera, a much smaller camera sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and images and a lower video quality. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.