Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a 98.9 score against 88.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a much better video definition.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.